<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Sober Look - Latest Comments in Bloomberg hypes up derivatives revenues, but the headline is misleading</title><link>http://soberlook.disqus.com/</link><description>Sober Look</description><atom:link href="https://soberlook.disqus.com/bloomberg_hypes_up_derivatives_revenues_but_the_headline_is_misleading/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 08:11:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Bloomberg hypes up derivatives revenues, but the headline is misleading</title><link>http://narrowtranche.blogspot.com/2009/06/bloomberg-hypes-up-derivatives-revenues.html#comment-11879951</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"interest rate contracts" does not mean derivatives.  Much of it is repo.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SoberLook</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 08:11:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bloomberg hypes up derivatives revenues, but the headline is misleading</title><link>http://narrowtranche.blogspot.com/2009/06/bloomberg-hypes-up-derivatives-revenues.html#comment-11871686</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Or maybe you should read the press release.  $9.1 of the $9.8 billion in revenue was from interest rate contracts.  Which are derivatives.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Basically, the Bloomberg headline is accurate, and there is far more detail in the report than you imply.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ed</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 01:12:16 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>